Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c

From: Sam Ravnborg (sam@ravnborg.org)
Date: Wed Feb 05 2003 - 14:46:55 EST

Next message: Pavel Janík: "Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
Previous message: Dave Jones: "Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c"
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c"
Next in thread: Dave Kleikamp: "Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Andrea

It was in cset 1.879.43.1 that the change was made.
Long time before the cset you noted.

To me it looks like the same change were applied twice to Linus's
BK tree.

[cset's from a vanilla clone of Linus'es BK tree].

Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Janík: "Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
Previous message: Dave Jones: "Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c"
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c"
Next in thread: Dave Kleikamp: "Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:18 EST