Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59

From: Mark Hahn (hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca)
Date: Wed Feb 05 2003 - 11:26:34 EST


> No. If one were to add such a field, then it would be accessible
> through the ctl_table structure that is already passed to the hook.
> You would not replace the ctl_table parameter with the kernel's
> sensitivity hint, since the security module must be able to make its

can all this LSM nonsese be CONFIG'ed out of the kernel as promised?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:17 EST