Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance

From: Andreas Schwab (schwab@suse.de)
Date: Wed Feb 05 2003 - 05:36:32 EST

Next message: Yours Lovingly: "kernel profiling"
Previous message: Marcus Meissner: "[PATCH] fixed pcnet32 multicast listen on big endian"
In reply to: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
Next in thread: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
Reply: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> writes:

|> I am damn sure that if you compile with less sadistic alignment
|> you will get smaller *and* faster kernel.

So why don't you try it out? GCC offers everything you need for this
experiment.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Yours Lovingly: "kernel profiling"
Previous message: Marcus Meissner: "[PATCH] fixed pcnet32 multicast listen on big endian"
In reply to: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
Next in thread: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
Reply: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:17 EST