Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 17:14:06 EST


On 4 Feb 2003, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> If you want small and fast use lcc.

lcc isn't really something I want to use, since the license is so strange,
and thus can't be improved upon if there are issues with it.

Some people have used the Intel compiler - which obviously also cannot be
improved upon, but which is likely to start off pretty good. I don't
really want to use it myself - what I'd really like to see is gcc
splitting up just the C compiler as a separate project with more attention
to size and speed.

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:15 EST