> Personal opinion here but I know it is also held by many developers I
> know and work with. I'd rather have a compiler that produces correct and
> fast code but ran slow than one that produces slow or bad code and runs
> fast. Remember compilation is done far less often than run time
> execution.
Yeah, I'd make that tradeoff too, but gcc 3.2 doesn't give me that.
People keep saying it does, but I see no real evidence of it.
Show me the money.
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:15 EST