Re: [patch] HT scheduler, sched-2.5.59-D7

From: Martin J. Bligh (mbligh@aracnet.com)
Date: Wed Jan 22 2003 - 11:17:41 EST

Next message: Mark Mielke: "Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him"
Previous message: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: test suite?"
In reply to: Andrew Theurer: "Re: [patch] HT scheduler, sched-2.5.59-D7"
Next in thread: Andrew Theurer: "Re: [patch] HT scheduler, sched-2.5.59-D7"
Reply: Andrew Theurer: "Re: [patch] HT scheduler, sched-2.5.59-D7"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Michael, my experience has been that 2.5.59 loaded up the first node before
> distributing out tasks (at least on kernbench).

Could you throw a printk in map_cpu_to_node and check which cpus come out
on which nodes?

> I'll try to get some of these tests on x440 asap to compare.

So what are you running on now? the HT stuff?

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mark Mielke: "Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him"
Previous message: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: test suite?"
In reply to: Andrew Theurer: "Re: [patch] HT scheduler, sched-2.5.59-D7"
Next in thread: Andrew Theurer: "Re: [patch] HT scheduler, sched-2.5.59-D7"
Reply: Andrew Theurer: "Re: [patch] HT scheduler, sched-2.5.59-D7"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:29 EST