Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Sat Jan 18 2003 - 23:22:45 EST

Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Linux in the News! WooHoo!"
Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: Patch?: linux-2.5.59/sound/soundcore.c referenced non-existant errno variable"
In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2"
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:08:08PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> The severity of the MTRR regression in 2.5.59 is apparent from:

This is not a result of userland initscripts botching the MTRR; not
only are printk's in MTRR-setting routines not visible but it's also
apparent from the fact that highmem mem_map initialization suffers a
similar degradation adding almost a full 20 minutes to boot times.

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Linux in the News! WooHoo!"
Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: Patch?: linux-2.5.59/sound/soundcore.c referenced non-existant errno variable"
In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2"
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:20 EST