Bug? Sparc linux defines MAP_LOCKED == MAP_GROWSDOWN

From: Jamie Lokier (jamie@shareable.org)
Date: Fri Jan 17 2003 - 22:29:40 EST

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Minor header bug? MIPS (32-bit) nlink_t sign"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Question about threads and signals"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: Bug? Sparc linux defines MAP_LOCKED == MAP_GROWSDOWN"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Bug? Sparc linux defines MAP_LOCKED == MAP_GROWSDOWN"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sparc and Sparc64, MAP_LOCKED and MAP_GROWSDOWN are both defined
as 0x100. This is a bug, isn't it?

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Minor header bug? MIPS (32-bit) nlink_t sign"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Question about threads and signals"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: Bug? Sparc linux defines MAP_LOCKED == MAP_GROWSDOWN"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Bug? Sparc linux defines MAP_LOCKED == MAP_GROWSDOWN"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:17 EST