Hi,
"Robert P. J. Day" wrote:
> so the issues:
>
> 1) trivial: comment is wrong, there is no dependency on
> EXPERIMENTAL
This has to be answered by the I2C maintainer.
> 2) since, in the sourcing Kconfig file, I2C_PROC *already* depends
> on I2C, is there any practical value in having the dependency
> "I2C && I2C_PROC". wouldn't "depends on I2C_PROC" be sufficient?
Yes.
> 3) finally, given that the comment at the top is adamant that
> all of these options depend on I2C and I2C_PROC, wouldn't it
> be cleaner to just make the menu itself say:
>
> menu "I2C HW Sensors Mainboard Support"
> depends on I2C && I2C_PROC (or just I2C_PROC)
> ...
>
> and let the internal options inherit this dependency?
Yes, the menu entry needs the dependencies as well.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:17 EST