Re: [patch] IDE OnTrack remap for 2.5.58

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Thu Jan 16 2003 - 17:40:24 EST

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [PATCH] (0/3) NUMA aware scheduler"
Previous message: John Bradford: "Re: Open source hardware"
In reply to: Jim Houston: "[patch] IDE OnTrack remap for 2.5.58"
Next in thread: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [patch] IDE OnTrack remap for 2.5.58"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

jim.houston@attbi.com said:
> +#if defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE) || defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_MODULE)

Don't ever do that. Modules can be built later and shouldn't affect the
static kernel unless it's _absolutely_ necessary. And were these weird
partitioning schemes specific to IDE anyway?

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [PATCH] (0/3) NUMA aware scheduler"
Previous message: John Bradford: "Re: Open source hardware"
In reply to: Jim Houston: "[patch] IDE OnTrack remap for 2.5.58"
Next in thread: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [patch] IDE OnTrack remap for 2.5.58"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:14 EST