On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:46:38PM +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <20030115191942.GD47@DervishD>,
> DervishD <raul@pleyades.net> wrote:
> >> > of init. Remember, is not any program, is an init. Should be a more
> >> > clean way, I suppose :??
> >> I don't think is that big a deal ... if you startup the system normally,
> >> sooner or later, /proc is going to be mounted. A [quickie] variation is:
> >
> > Yes, I know, and that's one option, but I would like to avoid the
> >mounting. Not a big deal, anyway, as you say. The only thing is that
> >it won't work in kernels without proc enabled (yes, there are people
> >without 'proc', size issues, I suppose, etc...).
>
> I assume that init is passed on the kernel command line like
> init=/what/ever, right ?
>
> Why not make that INIT=/what/ever, then make this /sbin/init:
Why not make a kernel patch that sets the INIT environment variable for
the init process ?
--
................................................................
: jakob@unthought.net : And I see the elder races, :
:.........................: putrid forms of man :
: Jakob Østergaard : See him rise and claim the earth, :
: OZ9ABN : his downfall is at hand. :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:13 EST