RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup

• Next message: DervishD: "Re: argv0 revisited..."
• Previous message: Thomas Schlichter: "problem using integer division in kernel modules"
• Next in thread: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>> Can these (MAX_IO_APICS, MAX_APICS) be moved to sub-arch too, instead of

Yes, pleeese! Without CLUSTERED_APIC I would have to re-define it in some
ugly way in subarch.

>Actually replacing CONFIG_X86_NUMA with CONFIG_NUMA ... and we could
>do (CONFIG_NUMA || CONFIG_BIGSMP) instead. But you're right, subarch
>would be much better if you can find a way.

With BIGSMP, we are still only allowed 16, whereus es7000 needs 256 of
each...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: DervishD: "Re: argv0 revisited..."
• Previous message: Thomas Schlichter: "problem using integer division in kernel modules"
• Next in thread: Protasevich, Natalie: "RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:55 EST