RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup

From: Martin J. Bligh (mbligh@aracnet.com)
Date: Wed Jan 15 2003 - 13:37:30 EST


> Can these (MAX_IO_APICS, MAX_APICS) be moved to sub-arch too, instead of

Not easily, at least not without creating a circular dependency problem.
Try it ;-)

I guess we chould create another subarch header file just for these if we
really have to, but that seem like overkill.

If you can come up with a clean patch (check it compiles on uniproc with
and without IO/APIC turned on, and standard SMP as well), I'd really
be interested to see it ... would be most helpful

> replacing CONFIG NUMA by CONFIG NUMAQ?

Actually replacing CONFIG_X86_NUMA with CONFIG_NUMA ... and we could
do (CONFIG_NUMA || CONFIG_BIGSMP) instead. But you're right, subarch
would be much better if you can find a way.

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:55 EST