Re: [BK-2.5] Update arm implementation of DMA API to include GFP_ flags

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Tue Jan 14 2003 - 01:36:41 EST

Next message: Bruce Harada: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [BK-2.5] Update the generic DMA API to take GFP_ flags on allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:30:18 +0000

   ChangeSet 1.930.8.3, 2003/01/13 10:30:18-06:00, jejb@raven.il.steeleye.com

           Update arm implementation of DMA API to include GFP_ flags

Is this really safe? Maybe ARM needs to use GFP_ATOMIC all the
time for a specific reason, such as where and how it maps the
cpu side mappings of the memory?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bruce Harada: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [BK-2.5] Update the generic DMA API to take GFP_ flags on allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:49 EST