Re: PATCH: [2.4.21-pre3] IDE error recovery

From: Ross Biro (rossb@google.com)
Date: Mon Jan 13 2003 - 22:44:52 EST


Someone said there were word wrapping problems with my mailer. I'm too
lazy to get a real mailer, so here's an attachment.

       Ross

Ross Biro wrote:

>
> Take this patch with a big grain of salt.
>
> The current IDE error recovery code will send a IDLEIMMEDIATE in the
> case when a drive is still busy or has drq set during an error. This
> is a violation of the ATA spec and hoses up quite a few drives. The
> prefered form of error recovery seems to be a soft reset followed by a
> set features. This patch replaces the IDLEIMMEDIATE with a reset, but
> does not do the set features. The set features should not be
> necessary, but at least one drive vendor does most of their testing
> with the set features. OK_TO_RESET_CONTROLLER must be set to 1 if
> this patch is applied.
>
> I've modified the google kernel to add a desired_speed to ide_drive_t
> and check to see if current_speed != desired_speed before every read
> or write request. This causes a set features after a reset. I can
> provide patches to do something similiar for 2.4.21, but I'm not sure
> it's appropriate. There are bugs in the way hdparm -X is handled in
> 2.4.20, and this patch would fix them as well, but it may be too large
> of a patch for a stable kernel.
>
> This also fixes drive_cmd_intr to do a little better checking to make
> sure the device is ready. The spec requires this, but any device that
> sends an interrupt before it's ready is probably broken.
>
> I have no idea what impact this will have on older devices or non disks.
>
> This patch has only been minimally tested.
>
> ----- snip -------
> diff -durbB linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
> linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
> --- linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c Wed Jan 8 16:25:04 2003
> +++ linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c Thu Jan 9 11:38:22 2003
> @@ -644,7 +644,11 @@
> }
> if (HWIF(drive)->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG) & (BUSY_STAT|DRQ_STAT)) {
> /* force an abort */
> - HWIF(drive)->OUTB(WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE,IDE_COMMAND_REG);
> + /* This violates the ATA Spec and causes trouble for
> + many modern hard drives. I'm not sure if it is
> necessary
> + for older devices or even modern cd-roms. -- RAB
> +
> HWIF(drive)->OUTB(WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE,IDE_COMMAND_REG); */
> + rq->errors |= ERROR_RESET;
> }
> if (rq->errors >= ERROR_MAX) {
> DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 0);
> diff -durbB linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c
> linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c
> --- linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c Wed Jan 8 16:25:17 2003
> +++ linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c Thu Jan 9 11:40:20 2003
> @@ -943,7 +943,11 @@
> }
> if (hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG) & (BUSY_STAT|DRQ_STAT)) {
> /* force an abort */
> - hwif->OUTB(WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE,IDE_COMMAND_REG);
> + /* This violates the ATA Spec and causes trouble for
> + many modern hard drives. I'm not sure if it is
> necessary
> + for older devices or even other modern devices. --
> RAB
> + hwif->OUTB(WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE,IDE_COMMAND_REG); */
> + rq->errors |= ERROR_RESET;
> }
> if (rq->errors >= ERROR_MAX)
> DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 0);
> diff -durbB linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> --- linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-io.c Wed Jan 8 16:25:37 2003
> +++ linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-io.c Mon Jan 13 18:01:52 2003
> @@ -328,7 +328,12 @@
> }
> if (hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG) & (BUSY_STAT|DRQ_STAT)) {
> /* force an abort */
> + /* This violates the ATA Spec and causes trouble for
> + many modern hard drives. I'm not sure if it is
> necessary
> + for older devices or even other modern ata devices
> -- RAB
> hwif->OUTB(WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE,IDE_COMMAND_REG);
> + */
> + rq->errors |= ERROR_RESET;
> }
> if (rq->errors >= ERROR_MAX) {
> if (drive->driver != NULL)
> @@ -397,18 +402,63 @@
> struct request *rq = HWGROUP(drive)->rq;
> ide_hwif_t *hwif = HWIF(drive);
> u8 *args = (u8 *) rq->buffer;
> - u8 stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG);
> + u8 stat;
> int retries = 10;
>
> + /* The ATA-6 spec requires a 400ns wait when entering the
> + HPIOI1: Check_status State from the HI4 state. We should
> + only get here coming from the HPIOI0 INTRQ_wait state, but
> + better safe than sorry. The spec also says a read of the
> + alt status register accomplishes this wait. */
> + if (IDE_CONTROL_REG)
> + (void)hwif->INB(IDE_ALTSTATUS_REG);
> + else
> + ide_delay_400ns();
> +
> + /* The ATA-6 spec says that the should enter the check status
> + state when it get's an interrupt for a drive command, so
> + technically, the device can send an interrupt before it has
> + finished. I would consider any device that does this to be
> + broken, but the spec allows it. --RAB 1/10/03 */
> + stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG);
> + if (stat & BUSY_STAT) {
> + /* We are just supposed to poll from here on out. */
> + if (HWGROUP(drive)->poll_timeout == 0) {
> +
> HWGROUP(drive)->poll_timeout=WAIT_CMD/CMD_POLL_TICKS;
> + } else if (--HWGROUP(drive)->poll_timeout == 0) {
> + return DRIVER(drive)->error(drive,
> + "drive_cmd timeout",
> + stat);
> + }
> + ide_set_handler(drive, drive_cmd_intr,
> CMD_POLL_TICKS, NULL);
> + return ide_started;
> + }
> +
> local_irq_enable();
> - if ((stat & DRQ_STAT) && args && args[3]) {
> +
> + /* We want to make sure that the device and the command
> + both agree on wether or not data is returned by the command
> + that was just issued. If they do not, it is an error. */
> + if (args && args[3]) {
> u8 io_32bit = drive->io_32bit;
> + /* The software expects some data back. If the drive
> does
> + not, then it is an error. */
> + if (!(stat & DRQ_STAT)) {
> + return DRIVER(drive)->error(drive, "drive_cmd
> no data", stat);
> + }
> drive->io_32bit = 0;
> hwif->ata_input_data(drive, &args[4], args[3] * SECTOR_WORDS);
> drive->io_32bit = io_32bit;
> while (((stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG)) & BUSY_STAT) &&
> retries--)
> udelay(100);
> + } else {
> + /* The software does not expect data, so if the drive
> + returns some, then it's an error. */
> + if (stat & DRQ_STAT) {
> + return DRIVER(drive)->error(drive, "drive_cmd
> unexpected data", stat);
> + }
> }
> +
>
> if (!OK_STAT(stat, READY_STAT, BAD_STAT))
> return DRIVER(drive)->error(drive, "drive_cmd", stat);
> diff -durbB linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c
> linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c
> --- linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c Wed Jan 8 16:25:43
> 2003
> +++ linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c Fri Jan 10 11:19:07
> 2003
> @@ -485,7 +485,13 @@
> }
> if (hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG) & (BUSY_STAT|DRQ_STAT)) {
> /* force an abort */
> - hwif->OUTB(WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE, IDE_COMMAND_REG);
> + /* This violates the ATA Spec and causes trouble for
> + many modern hard drives. I'm not sure if it is
> necessary
> + for older devices or even other modern ata devices
> -- RAB
> + hwif->OUTB(WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE,IDE_COMMAND_REG);
> + */
> + rq->errors |= ERROR_RESET;
> +
> }
> if (rq->errors >= ERROR_MAX) {
> DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 0);
> diff -durbB linux-2.4.20-p1/include/linux/ide.h
> linux-2.4.20-p2/include/linux/ide.h
> --- linux-2.4.20-p1/include/linux/ide.h Thu Jan 9 15:37:22 2003
> +++ linux-2.4.20-p2/include/linux/ide.h Mon Jan 13 18:04:47 2003
> @@ -271,6 +271,10 @@
> #define WAIT_WORSTCASE (30*HZ) /* 30sec - worst case when
> spinning up */
> #define WAIT_CMD (10*HZ) /* 10sec - maximum wait for an IRQ to
> happen */
> #define WAIT_MIN_SLEEP (2*HZ/100) /* 20msec - minimum sleep time */
> +#define CMD_POLL_TICKS (1) /* How long to wait in ticks between
> + status checks for a drive cmd
> + that set it's interrupt before it
> + was complete. */
>
> #define HOST(hwif,chipset) \
> { \
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:49 EST