Re: Sending sk_buffs without being tied to a struct sock

From: Joshua Stewart (joshua.stewart@comcast.net)
Date: Sun Jan 12 2003 - 22:11:51 EST


At this point, if I call skb->dst->output() what should skb->data point
to? A properly crafted IP packet? Checksummed and all? I shouldn't
need any layer 2 info in my skb at all to use this solution, should I?

Thanks for the help. I think this will do the trick.

J

On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 12:28, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Joshua Stewart wrote:
>
> >
> >I'm trying to take "hand-built" sk_buffs with little more than some data
> >and a dev member and push them to the NIC for transmission. I would
> >like to simply give them to dev_queue_xmit. Does anybody know what
> >state I should have them in before handing them to dev_queue_xmit?
> >Should skb->data point to the start of a MAC header or an IP header?
> >
> >Also, given an IP address in skb->nh.iph->daddr, what's the easiest way
> >to get the appropriate MAC address?
> >
> use ip_route_output_key() and then skb->dst->output(), that way it will work on all media
> and you don't have to care about l2 resolving at all.
>
>
> Patrick
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:43 EST