Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

• Next message: Andrew Walrond: "Re: Moderated forum for linux-kernel"
• Previous message: Erich Focht: "NUMA scheduler 2nd approach"
• In reply to: Rob Wilkens: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
• Next in thread: Rob Wilkens: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
• Reply: Rob Wilkens: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

<quote who="Rob Wilkens">
> On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 18:39, Emiliano Gabrielli wrote:
>> Now I understand the reason of your trollness !!
>
> Enough with the personal attacks.. They get you know where, I'm not botherred by them,
> and they clog the list.
>
> -Rob

Ok, my apologises... what I would say is "why don't you sit for a moment and think about
what a lot of skilled coder said you ???"

What I can't understand in you is the reason of your insistence, ...

cheers :-)

-- 
Emiliano Gabrielli
dip. di Fisica
2° Università di Roma "Tor Vergata"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andrew Walrond: "Re: Moderated forum for linux-kernel"
• Previous message: Erich Focht: "NUMA scheduler 2nd approach"
• In reply to: Rob Wilkens: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
• Next in thread: Rob Wilkens: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
• Reply: Rob Wilkens: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:42 EST