Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

From: Emiliano Gabrielli (emiliano.gabrielli@roma2.infn.it)
Date: Sun Jan 12 2003 - 18:39:37 EST

<quote who="Rob Wilkens">
> On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:52, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 05:34:58PM -0500, Rob Wilkens wrote:
>> > You're wrong. You wouldn't have to jump over them any more than you have to jump
>> over the "goto" statement.
>>
>> The goto is a conditional jump. You propose replacing it with a
>> conditional jump past the error handling code predicated on the
>> opposite condition. Where's the improvement?
>
> The goto is absolutely not a conditional jump. The if that precedes it is
> conditional. The goto is not. The if is already there.
>
> -Rob

Oh my God ... really you are the only one on this list not to understand that hi has
mispelled ?!?

Now I understand the reason of your trollness !! 

-- 
Emiliano Gabrielli

dip. di Fisica
2° Università di Roma "Tor Vergata"

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:42 EST