Re: choice of raid5 checksumming algorithm wrong ?

From: Rene Rebe (rene.rebe@gmx.net)
Date: Sun Jan 12 2003 - 11:14:34 EST


Hi.

Hm - for me the different throughputs are a nice initial benchmark
... - I like them being printed out.

On: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:44:44 -0500 (EST),
    "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@baby-dragons.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Rene , All , How about just printing the algorithm that is
> chosen & not the others ? Just an idea . JimL
>
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Rene Rebe wrote:
> > Hi.
> > In the case s.o. wants to pull the patch:
> > http://www.rocklinux.org/sources/package/base/linux24/82-raid5-niceer-output.patch
> > It is only a one-liner. It is not really nice since I print the
> > "writing arround L2 cache" text when XOR_SELECT_TEMPLATE is defined -
> > this might also be the case for an later AlitVec version for PowerPC
> > or so. So we might want a more generic text - or a text in the
> > appropriated .h file whetre XOR_SELECT_TEMPLATE is defined ...
> --
> +------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
> | Network Engineer | P.O. Box 854 | Give me Linux |
> | babydr@baby-dragons.com | Coudersport PA 16915 | only on AXP |
> +------------------------------------------------------------------+
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:40 EST