On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Andi Kleen wrote:
| On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 12:13:48PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
| > On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:12:12 +0100, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> said:
| > >
| > > > So the end-result of the discussion is, "What should really happen here?"
| > > > and "What, if anything, do you want me to do?"
| > >
| > > IMHO best would be to get rid of /proc/*/wchan and keep the kallsyms
| > > lookup slow, simple and stupid.
| >
| > And replace the current /proc/*/wchan functionality with what?
|
| Ctrl-Rollen (or whatever the key is called on your keyboard) on the console,
| like in all previous linux releases.
Ctrl-ScrollLock on mine if I'm following you correctly.
Same as Sysrq-P if sysrq is enabled, except that the former
is always available.
Are there other similar functions that are available without
Sysrq enabled? If so, where can I find info about them?
(other than drivers/char/keyboard.c :)
| Note /proc/*/wchan is not in 2.4.
|
| Also you still have WCHAN in ps, just not a full backtrace.
-- ~Randy- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:34 EST