Re: [PATCH] Embed __this_module in module itself.

From: Miles Bader (miles@lsi.nec.co.jp)
Date: Wed Jan 08 2003 - 20:18:53 EST

Next message: studio3arc.com Admin: "RE: modutils x 2.5.54 almost there .. Generate-modprobe.conf not working"
Previous message: Paulo Andre': "RE: modutils x 2.5.54"
In reply to: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: [PATCH] Embed __this_module in module itself."
Next in thread: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: [PATCH] Embed __this_module in module itself."
Reply: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: [PATCH] Embed __this_module in module itself."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> writes:
> Not knowing much about v850, I wonder why you do not need to set the -m
> option. Most other architectures do this.

???

A far as I can see, no architecture does anything different than the
default.

[Why on earth would -m be needed, anyway?]

-Miles

-- 
Fast, small, soon; pick any 2.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: studio3arc.com Admin: "RE: modutils x 2.5.54 almost there .. Generate-modprobe.conf not working"
Previous message: Paulo Andre': "RE: modutils x 2.5.54"
In reply to: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: [PATCH] Embed __this_module in module itself."
Next in thread: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: [PATCH] Embed __this_module in module itself."
Reply: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: [PATCH] Embed __this_module in module itself."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:26 EST