Re: PCI code: why need outb (0x01, 0xCFB); ?

From: Maciej W. Rozycki (macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl)
Date: Wed Jan 08 2003 - 16:53:53 EST


On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Petr Vandrovec wrote:

> > Fortunately that's not true. Grab the relevant docs from:
> > 'ftp://download.intel.com/support/chipsets/430nx/'. The semantics of
> > 0xcf8, 0xcf9, 0xcfa and 0xcfb I/O ports when used as byte quantities is
> > explained there. Note that 0xcf8 and 0xcfa are the way to get at the PCI
> > config space using conf2 accesses.
>
> Thanks, page 34 of 290479.pdf is exactly what I was looking for
> (i.e. write 1 to 0xCFB to get PCI conf1, write 0 to get PCI conf2).
> Next time I'll complain immediately instead of spending time with
> browsing Intel website and google.

 Well, the download.intel.com docs are sometimes hard to get by. There
are a few EISA and basic peripheral specs nearby, too.

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available        +

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:25 EST