People, I am confident would rather use GPLd drivers in GNU/Linux, without checksums and make their own checksums, NT4 SP6 would get drivers from the makers of the iSCSI cards, its easy to make them, im working on GPLd support for USB under W95.
Dean McEwan, If the drugs don't work, [sarcasm] take more...[/sarcasm].
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 16:24:12 -0800 (PST) Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org> wrote:
attached mail follows:
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> Not quite the same thing. I'm referring to the hardware design. I've seen too
> much crap hidden in drivers to try and coverup crappy hardware
> design/implementation.
I never said there was hardware involved.
I could add hardware in the form of CAM.
Content Addressable Memory.
> I would presume your cut would come from my willingness to purchace the
> hardware. Your added value is a software demonstration of capability. My
Nope, it is pure software ... my cut is you buying the driver.
If the hardware fails, it is in opensouce drivers.
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:22 EST