On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 02:04:52PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Tomas Szepe wrote:
>
> | > [rddunlap@osdl.org]
> |
> | > | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | > | | I'd probably be happier if the current one didn't even _ask_ the user (or|
> | > | | only asked the user if kernel debugging is enabled), and just silently |
> | > | | defaulted to the normal values. |
> | > | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | >
> | Randy,
> |
> | this looks correct to me. Maybe using if/endif instead of the two
> | 'depends on' would make the entry more explicit to the eye of a future
> | beholder.
>
> Hey Tomas,
>
> Thanks for looking and giving me your comments.
>
> if/endif would be useful there, especially if there was also an 'else'
> available...
I think that's by design (if / else is limiting, which is why you have a
very flexible depends syntax). That looks exactly like what we do in
arch/ppc/Kconfig. Maybe a comment 'tho to make it more explicit what's
being done and why would be in order here however.
-- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:33 EST