"Grover, Andrew" wrote:
>
> > From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel@ucw.cz]
> > Acpi seems to create short-lived kernel threads, and I don't quite
> > understand why.
> >
> > In thermal.c
> >
> >
> > tz->timer.data = (unsigned long) tz;
> > tz->timer.function = acpi_thermal_run;
> > tz->timer.expires = jiffies + (HZ *
> > sleep_time) / 1000;
> > add_timer(&(tz->timer));
> >
> > and acpi_thermal_run creates kernel therad that runs
> > acpi_thermal_check. Why is not acpi_thermal_check called directly? I
> > don't like idea of thread being created every time thermal zone needs
> > to be polled...
>
> Are we allowed to block in a timer callback? One of the things
> thermal_check does is call a control method, which in turn can be very
> slow, sleep, etc., so I'd guess that's why the code tries to execute
> things in its own thread.
>
acpi_thermal_run is doing many sinful things. Blocking memory
allocations as well as launching kernel threads from within a
timer handler.
Converting it to use schedule_work() or schedule_delayed_work()
would fix that up.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:31 EST