Re: [2.5.54 + ACPI] Slow [Was: Re: [2.5.53] So sloowwwww......]

From: Randy.Dunlap (rddunlap@osdl.org)
Date: Sun Jan 05 2003 - 14:46:03 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.5.54 problem with IDE ICH4 and aic7xxx"
Previous message: Bruce Harada: "Re: Honest does not pay here ..."
In reply to: Paul Rolland: "Re: [2.5.54 + ACPI] Slow [Was: Re: [2.5.53] So sloowwwww......]"
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [2.5.54 + ACPI] Slow [Was: Re: [2.5.53] So sloowwwww......]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Paul Rolland wrote:

| Hello,
|
| > | | acpi= kernel parameters, I tried :
| > | | - acpi=no-idle
| > |
| > | This one (above) is the correct syntax.
| > | Looking at the code, it only takes effect if you are using
| > only 1 CPU.
| >
| > Sorry, I was looking at old source code.
| > apm=no-idle isn't in 2.5.54.
s/apm/acpi/ !!!

| Too bad...
| Does this mean there is no easy way to have ACPI running correctly
| on my machine ?
| If anyone knows ACPI code, please tell me if you want me to run
| some specific code to understand what's going on...

I'll have to leave that to someone else.

-- ~Randy

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.5.54 problem with IDE ICH4 and aic7xxx"
Previous message: Bruce Harada: "Re: Honest does not pay here ..."
In reply to: Paul Rolland: "Re: [2.5.54 + ACPI] Slow [Was: Re: [2.5.53] So sloowwwww......]"
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [2.5.54 + ACPI] Slow [Was: Re: [2.5.53] So sloowwwww......]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:29 EST