Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?

• Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [BENCHMARK] Lmbench 2.5.54-mm2 (impressive improvements)"
• Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Binary drivers and GPL"
• In reply to: Richard Stallman: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Richard Stallman wrote:
> I have the freedom to use Linux and ClearCase. If closed source modules
> were to be disallowed, it would be illegal for me to use this configuration,
> and I would be forced to use HP-UX or Solaris, and not Linux.
>
> You can't have freedom while using ClearCase, because it is non-free
> software. What we really need is a free replacement for it. Will
> people write one? Our main influence on whether people do this is by

People are already working on it: http://www.advogato.org/proj/Katie/

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                                                Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [BENCHMARK] Lmbench 2.5.54-mm2 (impressive improvements)"
• Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Binary drivers and GPL"
• In reply to: Richard Stallman: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:28 EST