Re: 2.5.54: Re: [PATCH][CFT] kexec (rewrite) for 2.5.52

• Next message: Matthias Andree: "Documentation/BK-usage/bksend problems?"
• Previous message: Chief Gadgeteer: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org> writes:

> Just so you do not feel that kexec (.52 rewrite) is always failing in
> 2.5.54 - it not. I am using it for most of my boots here. Aside from
> an intermittant hang starting usb, its worked very well. I have not
> installed any of your other patches. (ie. 2.5.54+kexec+myownpatch)

Thanks, I think.

It good except that it make mean the problem is harder to reproduce,
making debugging harder.

If you are not doing SMP, UP-IOAPIC or > 4GB of ram the other patches
should not be an issue.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Matthias Andree: "Documentation/BK-usage/bksend problems?"
• Previous message: Chief Gadgeteer: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:27 EST