Re: [RFC] irq handling code consolidation, second try (ppc part)

• Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [BENCHMARK] Lmbench 2.5.54-mm2 (impressive improvements)"
• Previous message: Joshua Stewart: "Re: Tryint to enable support for lm_sensors"
• In reply to: Andrey Panin: "[RFC] irq handling code consolidation, second try (ppc part)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> attached patch is a second try of IRQ handling code consolidation.
> This is a ppc specific patch (compiled successfuly).
>
> Beware, this patch removes some old(?) and crappy code:
> - irq_kmalloc(), irq_kfree() removed. If ppc need to register
> irqs early, it should use setup_irq() as all decent people do :))
> - request_irq() with NULL handler argument == free_irq(), does
> anyone use this kludge ?

Similar issues on ppc64 (since it started life as a copy of the ppc32 code :)
Im interested in moving to something generic.

Anton
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [BENCHMARK] Lmbench 2.5.54-mm2 (impressive improvements)"
• Previous message: Joshua Stewart: "Re: Tryint to enable support for lm_sensors"
• In reply to: Andrey Panin: "[RFC] irq handling code consolidation, second try (ppc part)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:27 EST