Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sat Jan 04 2003 - 13:16:16 EST

Next message: Andrew Walrond: "Re: Honest does not pay here ..."
Previous message: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "Re: Linux v2.5.54"
In reply to: Brad Hards: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Brad Hards wrote:

> I _hate_ intellectual property.

So don't use the word at all, think of it as intellectual patrimony
instead.

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Walrond: "Re: Honest does not pay here ..."
Previous message: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "Re: Linux v2.5.54"
In reply to: Brad Hards: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:26 EST