Re: [PATCH] menuconfig support for top-level config menu dependencies

From: Tomas Szepe (szepe@pinerecords.com)
Date: Fri Jan 03 2003 - 23:27:36 EST

Next message: Mark Rutherford: "Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently""
Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "RE: [Way OT]Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently""
In reply to: Roman Zippel: "[PATCH] menuconfig support for top-level config menu dependencies"
Next in thread: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [PATCH] menuconfig support for top-level config menu dependencies"
Reply: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [PATCH] menuconfig support for top-level config menu dependencies"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> [zippel@linux-m68k.org]
>
> Below is a first version, which implements the menuconfig keyword and
> makes use of at two places. The behaviour of 'make config' is still the
> same

That's a good thing, we probably want a few menus look exactly as before.

> but menuconfig and xconfig look a bit different.
> Comments welcome.

Looking good. Can you please rediff against current 2.5?

-- 
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mark Rutherford: "Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently""
Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "RE: [Way OT]Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently""
In reply to: Roman Zippel: "[PATCH] menuconfig support for top-level config menu dependencies"
Next in thread: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [PATCH] menuconfig support for top-level config menu dependencies"
Reply: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [PATCH] menuconfig support for top-level config menu dependencies"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:24 EST