Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem

From: Arjan van de Ven (arjanv@redhat.com)
Date: Fri Jan 03 2003 - 16:19:07 EST

Next message: Marco Monteiro: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Previous message: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [unify netdev config 19/22] net.1-sparc"
In reply to: Avery Fay: "Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem"
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 21:25, Avery Fay wrote:

> Should I get rid of IRQ load balancing? And what do you mean "Intel broke the P4's interrupt routing"?

well you can bind IRQ's to specific cpu's in /proc....

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Marco Monteiro: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Previous message: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [unify netdev config 19/22] net.1-sparc"
In reply to: Avery Fay: "Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem"
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:22 EST