On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 17:43:23 +0000
Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> wrote:
> What exactly do you mean by 'it' ? The PCI device id ?
>
Since he was referring to the host bridge names, i thought he meant the naming conventions.
> If they share the same device ID, then Bernhards patch is
> really no better...
>
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_P4X333 0x3168
>
> In fact, P4X333 defines a chipset rather than a chip.
> According to ..
> http://www.viatech.com/en/apollo/p4x333.jsp and
> http://www.viatech.com/en/apollo/p4x400.jsp ,
> the northbridge is a VT8754 in both models, so the
> correct define would seem to be PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8754
Then we were both wrong, and it should be vt8754.
> Just to confirm, device 3168 is the host bridge in lspci output right?
> And this does all work when you run a DRI application ?
>
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 3168 (rev 03)
And yes, DRI works :)
Rich
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:22 EST