Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?

From: Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Date: Fri Jan 03 2003 - 12:53:54 EST

Next message: Pablo Allietti: "(no subject)"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH 2.5.54] hermes: serialization fixes"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Remember that the next time you buy a chipset that is not supported.
> I will look for a check in the mail from you to pay for the support
> services.

Andre, Andre, Andre. Have I taught you nothing?!? Accept no checks,
only small unmarked bills in a brown paper bag.

:-)

-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pablo Allietti: "(no subject)"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH 2.5.54] hermes: serialization fixes"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:21 EST