Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?

From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen (hps@intermeta.de)
Date: Fri Jan 03 2003 - 10:40:23 EST

Next message: Hugo Mills: "Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently""
Previous message: BODA Karoly jr.: "Re: Linux-2.5.54-sparc64 compile errors"
In reply to: NEURONET: "Re: RE:Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"NEURONET" <sz@neuronet.hu> writes:

>> im currently picking a solicitor, NVidia will either win or lose, if I lose, M$ win > may soon be a lot like Linux.

>If you lose, you also create a precedent case
>what REALLY offensive cases could make use of
>in the future.

>(I'd advise re-reading Antigone from Sophokles
>before starting your Holy Battle...)

Come on, "Hells.Surfer" might watch the video but he wouldn't even
understand half of the words used in that book. And he might even miss
the punch line. =%-)

Regards
Henning

-- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH hps@intermeta.de

Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 info@intermeta.de D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Hugo Mills: "Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently""
Previous message: BODA Karoly jr.: "Re: Linux-2.5.54-sparc64 compile errors"
In reply to: NEURONET: "Re: RE:Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:21 EST