Re: Question about Zone Allocation 2.4.X

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Thu Jan 02 2003 - 19:11:27 EST


On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 06:15:54PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> Looks like we simply jetisioned the concept of a PPL (Physical Pages
> List) and went with a zone allocator instead. I'm sure there was a
> good reason for it historically. Rolling a separate zone is exactly
> what I was thinking when I reviewed the code intially. Question,
> which files will be affected so when I put this one in, I don't end
> up breaking the VM and userspace balancing logic. i.e. Could you
> point me to Jens' ZONE_DMA32 code as well.

Adding new zone types is easy. Just add them to mmzone.h, avoid setting
->virtual (which does not universally exist) in free_area_init_core()
if it's not perma-mapped, stuff them in the fallback sequence in
build_zonelists(), and detect them in arch/*/mm/init.c

Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:19 EST