Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Dec 30 2002 - 17:50:08 EST

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
Previous message: James Bottomley: "Re: [PATCH] rename CONFIG_VOYAGER to CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER"
In reply to: Ed Tomlinson: "[PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
Next in thread: Ed Tomlinson: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
Reply: Ed Tomlinson: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
Reply: Ed Tomlinson: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Very interesting, but I'll note there are actually two groupings to
solve - per user and per threadgroup. Also for small numbers of threads
you don't want to punish a task and ruin its balancing across CPUs

Have you looked at the per user fair share stuff too ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
Previous message: James Bottomley: "Re: [PATCH] rename CONFIG_VOYAGER to CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER"
In reply to: Ed Tomlinson: "[PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
Next in thread: Ed Tomlinson: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
Reply: Ed Tomlinson: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
Reply: Ed Tomlinson: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:17 EST