> The text is written as if it's thinking about handling 64-bit
> unsigned long, but it doesn't. The tables that map bits to
> pixels are completely unprepared for this.
>
> I thought about widening the tables, but I thought they'd get
> unreasonably large. There's no reason not to go ahead and
> handle this 32-bits at a time.
I thought the tables would come back to haunt us. The only reason the
tables where introduced was for speed enhancements. I reason the code is
extra complex was so you could pass 64 bits of data across the bus. I
still like to see that happen still. What do you think?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:13 EST