Re: [RFT][PATCH] generic device DMA implementation

From: James Bottomley (James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com)
Date: Sat Dec 28 2002 - 11:26:25 EST


manfred@colorfullife.com said:
> Your new documentation disagrees with the current implementation, and
> that is just wrong.

I don't agree that protecting users from cache line overlap misuse is current
implementation. It's certainly not on parisc which was the non-coherent
platform I chose to model this with, which platforms do it now for the pci_
API?

James

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:12 EST