Re: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?

From: Hubert Mantel (mantel@suse.de)
Date: Fri Dec 27 2002 - 07:03:41 EST

Next message: Ben Bell: "Hangs (no Sysrq) on Duron + KT333?"
Previous message: Nikita Danilov: "Re: missed inode->i_hash cleanup in prune_icache()"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Wed, Dec 25, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
>
> > is there _any_ reason why below patch isn't merged yet?
>
> My guess is that the author never submitted it for inclusion.

Wrong guess:

http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2002-21/0819.html

> Rik
                                                                  -o)
    Hubert Mantel Goodbye, dots... /\\
                                                                 _\_v
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ben Bell: "Hangs (no Sysrq) on Duron + KT333?"
Previous message: Nikita Danilov: "Re: missed inode->i_hash cleanup in prune_icache()"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:10 EST