RE: CPU failures ... or something else ?

From: Josh Brooks (user@mail.econolodgetulsa.com)
Date: Thu Dec 26 2002 - 01:35:16 EST


Well, that's the thing - I _didn't_ switch cpus. Sometimes the error is
cpu 0, sometimes it is cpu 1.

On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:

> > usually it says proc #1 in the error, but
> > the first time it said proc #0 - is that
> > interesting ?
>
> proc 0 and proc 1 are CPU 0 and CPU 1, respectively. If you switched CPU's
> and now the error is on the other proc, then it IS a CPU error.
>
> Joseph Wagner
>
> P.S. In hindsight, I probably should have read the entire thread before
> responding. 8-) You live you learn.
>
> Joseph Wagner
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:08 EST