Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance

From: Rogier Wolff (R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl)
Date: Tue Dec 24 2002 - 16:10:19 EST

Next message: Randy S.: "nForce2 chipset and agpgart: unsupported bridge?"
Previous message: Jeremy Fitzhardinge: "Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?)"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 10:51:11AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Everything here fits in one cache-line, so clearly the cacheline issues
> don't matter.

I'm getting old. Larger cache lines, you're right.

Roger.

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* The Worlds Ecosystem is a stable system. Stable systems may experience *
* excursions from the stable situation. We are currently in such an      * 
* excursion: The stable situation does not include humans. ***************
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Randy S.: "nForce2 chipset and agpgart: unsupported bridge?"
Previous message: Jeremy Fitzhardinge: "Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?)"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:07 EST