On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 03:27:40PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> "Andrey Panin" <pazke@orbita1.ru> writes:
> > this patch moves some common parts of irq handling code to one place.
> > Arch specific patches will follow. Patch for i386 is tested and performed
> > well, but other arch specific patched are not. Please take a look.
>
> Hmm, well it looks like it will work perfectly with the v850 (which
> makes sense as it's mostly a copy of the i386 code).
I have a patch for v850 already, I'll send it soon.
> What about request_irq/setup_irq? The majority of architectures use
> exactly the same code as i386 for these; a few do not, so perhaps this
> is a case where a HAVE_ARCH_... define could be used.
>
> [setup_irq even has this comment:
>
> /* this was setup_x86_irq but it seems pretty generic */
> int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction * new)
> ]
It will be the next part of work. I'm changing my job now and
lack of time limits my perfomance :(
> -Miles
> --
> Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here,
> beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?
-- Andrey Panin | Embedded systems software developer pazke@orbita1.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:06 EST