On 23 Dec 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 01:18, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > That's because originally there was no fix.line_length field, and the line
> > length was derived from var.xres_virtual and var.bits_per_pixel.
> >
> > With some hardware, the line length must be a multiple of 32 or 64 bits, and we
> > needed a way to specify that, so fix.line_length was introduced. If it was
> > zero, user code should fallback to the old behavior.
>
> And with some cards, the line length is constant. Ie. to get to
> "X, Y + 1" for a given "X, Y" you add a constant to your current
> frame buffer pointer.
>
> That is what fix.line_length is for right?
Yep.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.orgIn personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:32 EST