Followup to: <200212170614.gBH6ELs15888@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
By author: Denis Vlasenko <firstname.lastname@example.org>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> As to HT, it's definitely a good thing. Multiple CPUs on a chip is
> a logical step. HT in P4 is rather weak, but future processors will
> likely have more advanced cores.
SMT and SMP-on-chip are two very different things.
> I never heard about HT from AMD camp. I'm curious what they do. ;)
Not have insanely long pipelines, so that a single thread can actually
use the processor functional units?
-- <email@example.com> at work, <firstname.lastname@example.org> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <email@example.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:18 EST