On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:06:41PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> The second format is simpler but there have been reports that it does
> not work with some versions of gcc. I have been unable to find a
> definitive statement about which versions of gcc fail and whether the
> problem has been fixed. Anybody care to provide a definitive
> statement?
When the problem appeared, it turned out to be an incorrectly configured
and/or built gcc installation. (therefore, by definition, not a kernel
problem.)
I believe the reporter of the problem subsequently fixed his compiler
installation.
I do, however, think we need to lobby the gcc people to get the
"depreciated" status of -iwithprefix reversed - it is a simple solution
to an otherwise disgusting amount of grep/awk/sed.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:33 EST