Re: Symlink indirection

From: Andrew Walrond (andrew@walrond.org)
Date: Fri Dec 13 2002 - 11:24:04 EST


No, I think marc was right...

daedalus@bob sym $ ls -l
total 4
lrwxrwxrwx 1 daedalus users 1 Dec 13 16:19 a -> b
lrwxrwxrwx 1 daedalus users 1 Dec 13 16:19 b -> c
lrwxrwxrwx 1 daedalus users 1 Dec 13 16:20 c -> d
lrwxrwxrwx 1 daedalus users 1 Dec 13 16:20 d -> e
lrwxrwxrwx 1 daedalus users 1 Dec 13 16:20 e -> f
lrwxrwxrwx 1 daedalus users 1 Dec 13 16:20 f -> g
lrwxrwxrwx 1 daedalus users 4 Dec 13 16:21 g -> test
-rw-r--r-- 1 daedalus users 6 Dec 13 16:18 test
daedalus@bob sym $ cat a
cat: a: Too many levels of symbolic links
daedalus@bob sym $ cat b
cat: b: Too many levels of symbolic links
daedalus@bob sym $ cat c
Hello

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:29 EST