Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture independent

From: Stephen Rothwell (sfr@canb.auug.org.au)
Date: Fri Dec 13 2002 - 01:18:52 EST

Next message: Nivedita Singhvi: "Re: R: Kernel bug handling TCP_RTO_MAX?"
Previous message: Steffen Persvold: "Re: [PATCH][2.5][RFC] Using xAPIC apic address space on !Summit"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture independent"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 21:32:31 -0800 (PST) "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I'm totally fine with this stuff (and the sparc64 specific part), but
> watch out, this patch removes the kernel/compat.c utimes stuff :-)

And adds it into fs/compat.c where it should have been in the first place ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Nivedita Singhvi: "Re: R: Kernel bug handling TCP_RTO_MAX?"
Previous message: Steffen Persvold: "Re: [PATCH][2.5][RFC] Using xAPIC apic address space on !Summit"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture independent"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:28 EST