[PATCH] signal.c: wrong rt signals comment, 2.4.20-pre11

• Next message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: massive compile failures w/ 2.5.51 on RH8.0"
• Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture independent"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I'm sorry for being a little out of date.

I believe it's the RT signals that get queued. Someone please apply
against 2.5.x?

--- linux/kernel/signal.c Sat Oct 19 11:58:48 2002
+++ linux-2.4.20-pre11.mod/kernel/signal.c Thu Dec 12 22:31:48 2002
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@
                 kmem_cache_free(sigqueue_cachep,q);
                 atomic_dec(&nr_queued_signals);
 
- /* Non-RT signals can exist multiple times.. */
+ /* RT signals can exist multiple times.. */
                 if (sig >= SIGRTMIN) {
                         while ((q = *pp) != NULL) {
                                 if (q->info.si_signo == sig)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: massive compile failures w/ 2.5.51 on RH8.0"
• Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture independent"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:28 EST