>>>>+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sys_wait4);
>>>
>>>Martin, hold on just a second. Last I checked, sys_wait4 was
>>>used ONLY by a moronic code in ipvs, _and_ there was a comment
>>>by the author above it "we are too lazy to do it properly".
>>>Do you have a better reason to export it?
>>
>>Guess I'm the malefactor this time since I've sent this patch to Martin
>>after some email exchanges with a guy that wanted LVS to work on a s390.
>>I reckon I will fix the said moronic code to use a syscall wrapper for
>>sys_wait4() so we don't step on anyone's toes.
>
> I should not have called it moronic. Everyone has schedule
Don't worry about it. We haven't always been too kind with lost RH
piranha users in the past either ;).
> constraints. I am wondering though, if the LVS and ipvs
> module are maintained actively. Perhaps I owe them a patch.
LVS and its kernel modules are definitely actively maintained all the
way from 2.2.x to 2.5.x kernels and if you want I'll make you a 2.0.x
kernel version too. It's just that recently everybody got a bit busy and
thus new releases tend to follow each other in increasing time intervals.
A patch would always be very welcome of course.
Best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
-- echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq'|dc- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:26 EST